Taking on Dickens — A Guest Review

Great Expectations, by Charles Dickens

This novel is everything my mind ever pictured when it hears the name of Dickens – grimy, smoggy London; sly and somewhat greasy criminals; and ugly festering secrets (the rotted wedding cake was just a bonus). Great Expectations is widely considered to be Dickens’ most magnificent novel, and the story has been turned into a movie / television production at least fifteen times.

I hated it.

Great Expectations is the story of a young fellow named Pip, and that is where Dickens made his biggest mistake. I didn’t like Pip.

Despite my objections, our very young and mostly-innocent Pip is surrounded by an outrageously colorful set of characters – all infuriating. The pompous Uncle Pumblechook with his never-ending torture of multiplication questions; the brutal Mrs. Gargery who brings Pip up by unflinching hand; the sadistic and drop-dead gorgeous Estella that Pip adores from day one; one and all, they’re a miserable set of characters. They’re a fascinating bunch if you like people-watching, but if not, reading about these characters is painful. Depressing, even.

I won’t rehash the plot (that would be cheating!); just assume this is a coming-of-age story disguised as a mystery, and that somewhere along the way Pip forgets who his friends are.

But Dickens left one redeeming quality in the novel: I liked Joe. Pip’s older brother-in-law is a blacksmith; uncultured, awkward, and barely able to spell his name, Joe is the orphan Pip’s substitute father-figure. He is not the least dynamic or exciting, but he is gentle, good, and forgiving, and breathes a wisp of redemption into Pip’s tarnished world.

Therein lies the conundrum. I liked Joe enough to keep reading, but I liked Joe enough to be outraged at what I read. Pip bumbles through life utterly unaware of the hurt he causes, and has an unhealthy dose of all-too-human pride and foolishness. Yes, Pip is a fully believable character with his own flaws. Yes, I see the nastier truths of life mirrored in his story. But did I want to read about them? Not for 300 miserable pages, I didn’t.

On the positive side, the mystery was interesting (with rascally names like Magwitch floating around, how could it go wrong?). The characters are beautifully drawn. Pip’s surroundings are magnificently described, whether the haunting mists or the squalor of the city.

In the end, Pip somewhat redeems himself… but unlike the ever-forgiving Joe, I still hold a grudge. Will I ever read Great Expectations again? Not until I’ve forgotten how mad it made me when I read it the first time. Will I ever reread the sections of Joe and Pip eating together in the corner by the chimney? Oh yes. Many times!

If you like Dickens, jump for “Great Expectations.” This novel is his magnum opus. If you like spending time with nice people, run for your life – but not until you have read the first few chapters. There is a blacksmith worth meeting.

Christina wrote this review (a different perspective on a classic!) at my request. She recently graduated and holds a degree in Public Relations.


About Theresa

I live in an old farmhouse in upstate New York (no, *not* the big city!) in the country with my family, two dogs, two calves, and two horses. I love to cross stitch, quilt, read, and look at needlework blogs :) and I love coffee *and* tea!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Taking on Dickens — A Guest Review

  1. Amy @ Hope Is the Word says:

    Great review! I’m in the middle of GE for my bookclub, having not read it since 9th grade 25 years ago.

  2. hopeinbrazil says:

    It’s funny that this book should give you such a negative view of Dickens, since it had the opposite effect on me. I had disliked Dickens, till I met Joe. Then I was encouraged to read his other novels.

  3. Like Christina, who reviewed Great Exp. above, I too had this as required reading in high school. It was my introduction (excluding “A Christmas Carol” which *everyone* seems to be familiar with) to his writing. I enjoy his characterization and I think his purpose was to expose the hopelessness of those caught up in their situations of that time, so I guess we should expect his writing to often be a bit depressing!
    Anyway I thought her review thought-provoking and different from most I have read!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s